The Comparison of Executive Functions and Working Memory in Individuals with Obsessive - Compulsive Disorder and Normal People

Authors

Abstract

/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0
mso-style-noshow:yes
mso-style-priority:99
mso-style-qformat:yes
mso-style-parent:""
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt
mso-para-margin:0cm
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt
mso-pagination:widow-orphan
font-size:10.0pt
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"}



Inrtodaction: Although many studies have supported the model proposed by Wells in metacognition, it seems that this model is unable to explain some of the ambiguities were raised in the discussion of individual differences in personality study or cognitive failures. The present study examined metacognitive processing to highlight role of executive functions in high anxiety and low anxiety individuals, then proposed model for the complete Wells pattern about the relationship between metacognition and anxiety.

Method: 200 female students in Tarbiat Modares University completed the Metacognition Questionnaire, Cognitive Failures Questionnaire and Revised Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. The purpose of MCQ-30 and CFQ were to control the inclusion criteria. Then according to extreme scores in extraversion and neuroticism dimensions of EPQ-R, two groups (each group 15 subjects) including high anxiety and low anxiety were selected. Finally, the Stroop test and the Wisconsin card sorting test completed.    

Results: Results showed that metacognitive processing in low anxiety was better thanhigh anxiety Conclusion: It seems that the model proposed in this study is able to answer the questions on metacognition that Wells model is unable to explain them. Although the strength of this model is the need for more research measures.

Keywords

Journal of Clinical Psychology
Volume 7, Issue 2 - Serial Number 26
September 2015
Pages 15-28

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 29 January 2017
  • Revise Date:
  • Accept Date: 29 January 2017

Share

How to cite

Statistics