تحلیل کیفی روابط میان مؤلفه های روان درمانی در تجربه های بالینی روان درمانگران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی روانشناسی عمومی دوره دکتری، واحد علوم تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه آموزشی روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم‌تربیتی دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده ادبیات علوم‌انسانی و اجتماعی، واحد علوم تحقیقات دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: پژوهش­ های کیفی بخشی از تلاش­های است که برعمق روان­درمانی افزوده است. هدف این پژوهش کیفی شناخت نحوه روابط میان مؤلفه­ های روان­درمانی از طریق تجارب روان­درمانگران بود.
روش: روش این پژوهش، تحلیل محتوای کیفی بود. جمعیت مشارکت­ کنندکان روان­درمانگران مراکز روان­درمانی خانواده شهر تهران بودند. با شیوه نمونه­ گیری هدفمند 14 درمانگر انتخاب و با ابراز مصاحبه نیمه ­ساختاریافته اطلاعات گردآوری شد. داده ­ها با رویکرد تحلیل محتوای موضوعی از نوع تفسیری تحلیل شدند.
یافته­ ها: نتایج تحلیل داده­­ها 15 زیرطبقه و 4 طبقه اصلی درخصوص چگونگی روابط مؤلفه­ های مؤثر در روان­درمانی مشخص کرد. طبقات اصلی عبارتند از: 1. هماهنگ ­شدن مؤلفه­ ها بر مبنای اولویت تأثیرگذاری در درمان، 2. شکل­ گیری روان­درمانی در بستر ارتباط و نقش درمانگر، 3. نقش هر مؤلفه در انتخاب نوع درمان و 4. انتخاب نظریه در بستر ویژگی­های درمانگر.
نتیجه ­گیری: یافته­ های این پژوهش چارچوبی از نحوۀ روابط مؤلفه­ های روان­درمانی را برپایه دیدگاه و تجارب درمانگران صورت ­بندی کرد. مؤلفه­ ها با توجه به تأثیرگذاری­شان در فرآیند روان­درمانی، توسط درمانگران الویت­ بندی و به­ کار می­روند. همه مؤلفه­ ها در انتخاب نوع درمان نقش دارند، اما مؤلفۀ درمانگر در شکل­دهی ارتباط با درمانجو، سازمان­دهی نظریه، حل مشکلات و مؤثرسازی روان­درمانی نسبت به سایر مؤلفه­ ها نقش اساسی­ تری دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Qualitative Evaluation of Relationships between Psychotherapy Components in Clinical Experiences of Psychotherapists

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fariba Moradi Abbasabadi 1
  • Gholamreza Sarami Foroushani 2
  • Somayeh Robat Meili 3
1 PhD student in General Psychology, Research Sciences Branch of Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Literature, Humanities and Social Sciences, Research Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Qualitative research is part of an effort that has added depth to psychotherapy. This qualitative study aimed to identify the relationships between the components of psychotherapy through the experiences of psychotherapists.
Method: The research method used was qualitative content analysis and data were analyzed using thematic content analysis with an interpretive approach. Participants in the study were psychotherapists of family psychotherapy centers in Tehran so that 7 women and 7 men were selected by purposive sampling and observing ethics. In-depth interviews were used to collect data.
Results: According to the results of data analysis, 15 subcategories, and 4 main categories were identified regarding the relationship between components of psychotherapy. The main categories included 1) the coordination of components based on the priority of their effectiveness in treatment, 2) the formation of psychotherapy in the context of communication and the role of the therapist, 3) the role of each component in choosing the type of treatment, and 4) the selection of theory in the context of therapist characteristics.
Conclusion: The framework of the relationship between the components of psychotherapy based on the experiences of therapists was formulated in this study. The components are prioritized and used by therapists according to their effectiveness in the psychotherapy process. All components play a role in choosing the type of treatment. However, the component of the therapist has a more fundamental role than other components in shaping communication with the client, organizing theory, addressing the problems, and the effectiveness of psychotherapy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Psychotherapists' points of view
  • effective components of psychotherapy
  • qualitative analysis

مراجع

  1. Freud S, Bonaparte PM. The origins of psychoanalysis: Imago London; 1954.
  2. Erber R, Erber M. Intimate relationships: Issues, theories, and research: Psychology Press; 2016.
  3. Vaziri Sh. Objectives of treatment in four factor psychotherapy. Journal of Thought and Behavior. 2016;10(39). [Persian]
  4. Vaziri Sh., Lotfi Kashani, F. A four factor approach in psychotherapy. Journal of Thought and Behavior. 2015;9(35). [Persian]
  5. Zabihzadeh A., Hatami J., Panaghi L., Goshang N. Essentials of protection of marital privacy in the therapeutic relationship between the psychotherapist and client: a qualitative study based on the couple's perspective in Iranian culture. Quarterly Journal of Family Research; 2018, 54. [Persian]
  6. Sprenkle DH, Davis SD, Lebow JL. Common factors in couple and family therapy: The overlooked foundation for effective practice: Guilford Publications; 2013.
  7. Lambert MJ, Hill CE. Assessing psychotherapy outcomes and processes. 1994.
  8. Stricker G. Psychotherapy integration. Washington DC. 2010.
  9. Weiner IB, Bornstein RF. Principles of psychotherapy: Promoting evidence-based psychodynamic practice: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
  10. Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age: Stanford university press; 1991.
  11. Ahmadi J. Recognizing and prioritizing the problems of Iranian families referring to guidance and counseling centers and providing solutions. Sociology of the Family. 2006;1(1). [Persian]
  12. Yalom ID. The gift of therapy: An open letter to a new generation of therapists and their patients. 2002.
  13. Kozlowski D, Hutchinson M, Hurley J, Rowley J, Sutherland J. The role of emotion in clinical decision making: an integrative literature review. BMC medical education. 2017;17(1):1-13.
  14. Barkan Korcan M. Psychologists' experiences of decision-making in clinical work: A thematic analysis: University of East London; 2018.
  15. Paquin JD. Introduction to a special issue on clinician–researchers: a career engaged in both therapy research and practice. Taylor & Francis; 2017.
  16. Bagheri Kh., Khosravi Z., Akbari M.. Assumptions of Islamic Psychology. Journal of the Seminary and University 1995;5:25-39. [Persian]
  17. Pirbadaqi F. Qualitative content analysis and case studies. Research message. 2009;9(100).
  18. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. EE. UU. Aldine Publishing Company. https://doi. org/10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014; 1967.
  19. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Sage publications; 1990.
  20. Saldaña J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers: sage; 2021.
  21. Mohammadpour A. Anti-method: Philosophical contexts and practical procedures in qualitative methodology. Tehran: Logos Publications; 2019. [Persian]
  22. Heaton J. Wittgenstein and psychotherapy: From paradox to wonder: Springer; 2014.
  23. Wampold BE. The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models. Methods, and Findings. 2001;62.
  24. Wampold B. Methodological problems in identifying efficacious psychotherapies. Psychotherapy Research. 1997;7(1):21-43.
  25. Lebow JL. Integrative Couple Therapy. 2006.
  26. Hatcher RL, Barends AW. How a return to theory could help alliance research. Psychotherapy: Theory, research, practice, training. 2006;43(3):292.
  27. Safarzadeh S. Predicting the successful completion of individual psychotherapy based on the patient's characteristics and the competencies of the clinical specialist: the mediating role of therapeutic alliance: Semnan University; 2014. [Persian]
  28. Zarani F, Zadaghi, S. The role of culture in psychopathology and psychotherapy: Implications for promoting the cultural competence of psychotherapists. Rise of Psychology. 2017;6(2).
  29. Cabaniss DL. Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: A clinical manual: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
  30. Mobasheri M. Treatment Techniques in Psychoanalysis: Five Essays. Tehran: Niloufar Publications 2020. [Persian]

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 26 فروردین 1400
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 05 مرداد 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 شهریور 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار