اثربخشی زوج درمانی مبتنی بر روابط موضوعی بر رضایت زناشویی زوجین متقاضی طلاق با سازمان شخصیت مرزی خفیف: یک مطالعه آزمایشی با توجه به نقش تعدیل کننده‌ی کارکرد اجرایی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم‌تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم‌تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه روانشناسی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم‌تربیتی، دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

4 استاد، گروه روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده روانشناسی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی و توانبخشی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین اثربخشی زوج درمانی روابط موضوعی بر رضایت زناشویی زوجین متقاضی طلاق دارای سازمان شخصیت مرزی خفیف با توجه به نقش عملکرد اجرایی بود.
روش: به منظور نمونه گیری، 90 نفر از زوجین متقاضی طلاق مراجعه کننده به مراکز مشاوره شهر تهران، به صورت هدفمند توسط مصاحبه ساختاریافته STIPO برای ارزیابی سازمان شخصیت غربالگری شدند و نمونه نهایی شامل 48 نفر از زوجین با سازمان شخصیت مرزی خفیف انتخاب و به صورت تصادفی به دو گروه آزمایش و کنترل تقسیم گردیدند که با ریزش نمونه 11 زوج در گروه آزمایش و 8 زوج در گروه کنترل باقی ماندند. گروه آزمایش 14 جلسه زوج درمانی روابط موضوعی دریافت کردند، و گروه کنترل در لیست انتظار باقی ماندند. ابزار پژوهش شامل آزمون دسته بندی کارت های ویسکانسین و مقیاس رضایت زناشویی انریچ بود. داده‍‌ها به روش تحلیل کواریانس چند‌متغیره تجزیه و تحلیل گردید.
یافته ها: اثرات مثبت معناداری در مرحله‌ی پس آزمون بر رضایت زناشویی و مولفه‌هایش مشاهده گردید (0.01>P). بعلاوهدر افراد با عملکرد اجرایی بالاتر، اثربخشی درمان به صورت معناداری بالاتر بود (0.01>P).
نتیجه گیری: می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که زوج درمانی روابط موضوعی می‌تواند رضایت زناشویی زوجین دارای سازمان شخصیت مرزی خفیف را بهبود بخشیده و عملکرد اجرایی می‌تواند در اثربخشی درمان نقش تعدیل کننده داشته باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


  1. منابع

    1. Pourmeidani, S., Noori, A., SHafti, S.A. Relationship between life style and marital satisfaction. Journal of family research. 2014; 10(3): 331-334. [Persian]
    2. Nazari, R., Karbalaie Mohammad Meigooni, A. Structural model of perfectionism, psychological well-being and marital adjustment. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY. 2017; 11(3):411-432. [Persian]
    3. Korporaal, M., Broese van Groenou, M., & Tilburg, T. Health Problems and Marital Satisfaction Among Older Couples. Journal Of Aging And Health. 2013; 25(8): 1279-1298.
    4. Pourheidari, S., Bagherian, F., Dostkam, M. And Bahador Khan, c. The effect of life skills training on sexual and marital satisfaction in young couples. Journal of Knowledge and Research in Applied Psychology. 2013; 14(1): 22-14. [Persian]
    5. Shiota, M. N., & Levenson, R. W. Birds of a feather don't always fly farthest: Similarity in Big Five personality predicts more negative marital satisfaction trajectories in long-term marriages. Psychology and Aging. 2007; 22(4): 666-675.
    6. Fallahzadeh, H., Hashemi Gashnigani, R., Sadeghi, M. S., Mirzaei, M. Comparison of object relationships and perception of the relationship with the father in individuals seeking and not seeking divorce. Clinical Psychology and Counseling Research. 2016; 6 (1): 59-44. (Persian)
    7. Honarparvaran, Nazanin. The effectiveness of the integrated approach of imago therapy and the relationship with the object on controlling the emotions of the unfaithful couple. Psychological methods and models. 2017; 8 (27): 28-15. [Persian]
    8. Caligor, E., Kernberg, OF., Clarkin, JF. Handbook of dynamic psychotherapy for higher level personality pathology, 1th ed. Am psychiatr publ. 2007.
    9. Stern BS, Caligor E, Clarkin JF, Critchfield KL,Horz S, MacCornack V, Lenzenweger MF,Kernberg OF. Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO): Preliminary Psychometricsin a clinical sample. J Personal Assess. 2010; 921:44-35.
    10. Vizgaitis, A. L., & Lenzenweger, M.F. Pierced identities: Body modification, borderline personality features, identity and self-concept disturbances. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, & Treatment. 2019, 10: 154-162.
    11. Azizi, A., Ismaili, R., Dehghan Manshadi, M., Ismaili, S. The effectiveness of life skills training on marital satisfaction of divorced couples. Iranian Journal of Nursing. 2016; 29 (99-100): 33-22. [Persian]
    12. Poulton, J. Object relations and relationality in couple therapy: the middle ground. 2013.
    13. Mendelsohn, R. Five Types of “Couple Object-Relations” Seen in Couple Therapy: Implications for Theory and Practice. The Psychoanalytic Review. 2014; 101(1): 95-128.
    14. Kerr, M. Living the theory, the family therapy. networked New York: 2013.
    15. Landucci, J; & Foley, G. Couples Therapy: Treating Selected Personality disordered Couples Within a Dynamic Therapy Framework. Innov Clin Neurosci. 2016; 11(3–4):29–36.
    16. Ahmadi, Z., Ahmadi, S. A., Fatehizadeh, M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of short-term object relationship couple therapy on couple communication patterns. Journal of family research. 2006; 2 (6): 117-105. [Persian]
    17. Isazadegan A, Dostalizadeh S. Comparing the cognitive flexibility, cognitive fusion, cognitive defusion in male and female divorce applicants. Scientific Journal of Nursing, Midwifery and Paramedical Faculty. 2020; 5(4): 15-26. [Persian]
    18. Johnson, J. L., Kim, L. M., Giovannelli, T. S., &Cagle, T. Reinforcement sensitivity theory, vengeance, and forgiveness. Personality and Individual Differences. 2010; 4: 612–616.
    19. Isquith, P., Roth, R., & Gioia, G. Contribution of Rating Scales to the Assessment of Executive Functions. Applied Neuropsychology: Child. 2013; 2(2): 125-132.
    20. Schmeichel, B. J., & Tang, D. Individual differences in executive functioning and their relationship to emotional processes and responses. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2015; 24(2), 93-98.
    21. Ortega, L. A., Tracy, B. A., Gould, T. J., & Parikh, V. Effects of chronic low-and high-dose nicotine on cognitive flexibility in C57BL/6J mice. Behavioral brain research. 2013; 238: 134-145.
    22. Donovan J. Short- term object relations couple therapy the five-step model. 2003. Translated by Tabrizi, M., Mazloumi, S., Faramarzi, A. & Alaei, P. Tehran: fararavan. 2015. [Persian]
    23. Clarkin JF, Caligor E, Stern B, Kernberg OF. Structured Interview of Personality Organization. Personality disorders institute, Weil medical collegeof Cornell university. 2007.
    24. Clarkin, J.F., Caligor, E., Stern, B.L., & Kernberg, O.F. Structured Interview for Personality Organization—Revised (STIPO-R). Unpublished manuscript, Weill Cornell Medical College. 2015.
    25. Clarkin, J.F., Caligor, E., Stern, B.L., & Kernberg, O.F. Manual for the structured interview of personality organization-revised (STIPO-R). Unpublished manuscript, Weill Cornell Medical College. 2019.
    26. Doering, S., Burgmer, M., Heuft, G., Menke, D., Baumer, B., Lubking, M., Feldmann, M., Horz, S., & Schneider, G. Reliability and validity of the German version of the Structured Interview of Personality Organization (STIPO). BMC Psychiatry. 2013; 13: 2010-2223.
    27. Lezak, M. D. Handbook of Neuropsychological Assessment. 3rd Ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 5th edition. 2012.
    28. Ghasemi, N., Kiani, A., Armored, A., Rabiee, M., Vakili, N. Investigating the difference between attention bias, executive function and reaction time in amphetamine users compared to non-amphetamine users. Journal of Addiction Research on Substance Abuse. 2012; 6 (23): 64-53.
    29. Mehdipour, M., Sedaghatifard, M. Investigating the relationship between marital satisfaction and couple intimacy with adjustment at home. Journal of Analytical-Cognitive Psychology. 2015; 6 (22): 31-21. [Persian]
    30. Ahmadpour, A., Khaledi, T. Comparison of marital satisfaction and marital intimacy of employed and non-employed married students of Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch. Journal of Mental Health Principles. 2017;19 (3): 171-167. [Persian]
    31. Jahanbakhshian, N., Rasooli, M., Tajik Ismaili, A., Sarami Foroushani, Gh. Comparison of the effectiveness of group therapy based on Bowen family systems with group therapy based on short-term couple therapy object relationships on marital intimacy of women. Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2019; 17 (3): 226-213. [Persian]
    32. Shaker Dolaq, A., Afrooz, Gh. A., Narimani, M., Emamipour, S. The effectiveness of couple therapy short-term thematic relationships on improving the family performance of couples seeking divorce. Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 8 (2): 129-123.
    33. Shedler, J. The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy. American Psychological Association. 2010; 65(2): 98-109.
    34. Glick ID, Rait DS, Heru AM, Ascher MS. Couplesand family therapy in clinical practice. 2016.
    35. Mobassem, S., Delavar, A., Karami, A., Sanai, B., Shafiabadi, A. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy in Decreasing Marital Conflict in Women. Journal of Clinical Psychology Studies. 2013; 9: 102-81. [Persian]
    36. Mehryar, M; Golafrooz, S. An investigation on the effectiveness of group psychodynamic psychotherapy on the personality dimensions in divorced and non-divorce woman with low marital satisfaction. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health. 2017; Aug-Sep; 19(5):384-93.
    37. Randolph, J. J., & Chaytor, N. S. Promoting the executive functions: Core foundations,assessment considerations, and practical applications. In Positive Neuropsychology: Evidence-Based Perspectives on Promoting Cognitive Health, Springer. New York. 2013.
    38. Koesten, Joy & Schrodt, Paul & Ford, Debra. Cognitive Flexibility as a Mediator of Family Communication Environments and Young Adults' Well-Being. Health communication. 2009; 24. 82-94.
    39. Mashayekh F, and Asgarian M. Relationship between couples' intimacy and positive thinking with cognitive flexibility among married women. Quarterly journal of social work. 2019; 8 (2); 56-64. [Persian]
    40. Hill, A. Predictors of relationship satisfaction: The link between cognitive flexibility, compassionate love and level of differentiation. Alliant International University, California School of Professional Psychology, Los Angeles. 2008.