اثربخشی آموزش تلقیح استرس بر پرخاشگری، در پسران نوجوان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: این پژوهش با هدف بررسی اثربخشی آموزش تلقیح استرس بر پرخاشگری بدنی، کلامی و خصومت نوجوانان پسر صورت گرفت.
روش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع نیمه آزمایشی با طرح پیش آزمون-پس آزمون با دو گروه آزمایش و گواه است. جامعه‌ی ‌پژوهش حاضر پسران دانش آموز 12- 15 ساله‌ی منطقه‌ی 6 مشهد بود. نمونه‌ی پژوهش 24 دانش آموز بود که براساس کسب بیشترین نمره در آزمون پرخاشگری باس- پری انتخاب شده بودند و به صورت تصادفی به دو گروه آزمایش و گواه تقسیم شده بودند. ابزار این پژوهش پرسشنامه‌ی پرخاشگری باس- پری بود. آزمودنی‌های گروه آزمایش، آموزش تلقیح استرس را در 8 جلسه دریافت کردند. اما گروه گواه هیچ نوع خدمات روانشناختی دریافت نکردند. داده‌ها با استفاده از تحلیل کوواریانس یک متغیره و چند متغیره انجام شد.
یافته‌ها: نتایج نشان داد آموزش تلقیح استرس خصومت، پرخاشگری بدنی و پرخاشگری کلامی را در ‌گروه آزمایش نسبت به گروه گواه به طور معناداری کاهش می‌دهد (01/0>p). اما خشم در اثر آموزش تلقیح استرس تغییر معناداری در گروه آزمایش نسبت به گروه گواه نکرد.
نتیجه­گیری: آموزش تلقیح استرس با اثرگذاری بر ابعاد شناختی و رفتاری پرخاشگری روشی مؤثر برای کاهش میزان پرخاشگری و خصومت است. با وجود این، یک مداخله‌ی جامع‌تر (شامل خانواده و محیط اجتماعی) با جلسات درمانی بیشتر احتمالا می‌تواند بر کاهش خشم (بعد هیجانی پرخاشگری) تأثیرگذار باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training on Aggression, Anger and Hostility in Adolescent Boys

نویسندگان [English]

  • H Khadem, 1
  • Abbas Rahiminezhad 2
  • T. Ranjbari, 1
1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی بالینی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
2 دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
چکیده [English]

Introduction: This study was aimed to examine effectiveness of Stress Inoculation Training on physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger and hostility in adolescent boys.
Method: This study is quasi-experimental and pretest - posttest with control group. The study population included adolescent boys aged 12-15 years old in Mashhad. The sample was 24 students that were selected according to gain the highest score in Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire and randomly was assigned to experimental and control groups. Buss Perry Aggression Questionnaire was used as tool in current study. The experimental group received 8 sessions of Stress Inoculation Training but the control group did not receive any psychological treatment. Multivariate Analyses of covariance and One-Way Analysis of covariance were used to analyze the data.
Results: Findings indicated that Stress Inoculation Training significantly reduced hostility, physical aggression and verbal aggression in experimental group in comparison to control group (p < 0.01). However, no significant change was observed in anger in experimental group in comparison to the control group.
Conclusion: Stress Inoculation Training is effective method by affecting on cognitive and behavioral dimension for reducing aggression and hostility. However, more comprehensive intervention (including family and society) with more therapeutic sessions would probably be effective in reducing anger (emotional dimension of aggression)

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Stress Inoculation Training
  • aggression
  • Anger
  • Hostility
  • Adolescent
 1- Weintraub, M.L.R., et al., Perceptions of social mobility: development of a new psychosocial indicator associated with adolescent risk behaviors. Frontiers in public health. 2015. doi: 10.3389/fpubh. 2015. 00062.
2- Casey, B., et al., The storm and stress of adolescence: insights from human imaging and mouse genetics. Developmental psychobiology. 2010; 52(3): 225-35.
3- Deffenbacher, J.L., Cognitive-behavioral conceptualization and treatment of anger. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice. 2011; 18(2): 212-21.
4- Bandura, A., Aggression: A social learning analysis. 1973: Prentice-Hall.
5- Ramirez, J.M. and J.M. Andreu, Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity) Some comments from a research project. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2006; 30(3): 276-91.
6- Hoogsteder, L.M., et al., A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of individually oriented cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) for severe aggressive behavior in adolescents. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2015; 26(1): 22-37.
7- Siegman, A.W. and T.W. Smith, Anger, hostility, and the heart. 2013: Psychology Press.
8- Johnson, E.H., The deadly emotions: The role of anger, hostility, and aggression in health and emotional well-being. 1990: Praeger Publishers.
9- Conger, R.D., et al., Social and economic antecedents and consequences of adolescent aggressive personality: Predictions from the interactionist model. Development and psychopathology. 2015; 27(4pt1): 1111-27.
10- Smokowski, P.R., et al., Multilevel risk factors and developmental assets for internalizing symptoms and self-esteem in disadvantaged adolescents: Modeling longitudinal trajectories from the Rural Adaptation Project. Development and psychopathology. 2014; 26(4pt2): 1495-1513.
11- Felgoise, S., et al., Encyclopedia of cognitive behavior therapy. 2006: Springer Science & Business Media.
12- Meichenbaum, D., Treatment of individuals with anger-control problems and aggressive behaviors. 2003.
13- Yousefi N, E.O., Bahrami F, Fatehizadeh M, Ahmadi A, Mavarani A, Esanzadeh O, Botlani S., efficacy of therapy and Gestalt therapy in the treatment of anxiety, depression and aggression. J Dev Psych. 2009; 5(19): 251-9.
14- M., T., The efficacy of group logotherapy on depression and aggression, substance abusers. J Mod psychol res. 2011; 6(24): 19-38.
15- Kimiayi A, R.M., Soltanifar A, Emotional intelligence training and its effectiveness On reducing aggression aggressive. Res clin psychol cunsl. 2010; 1(1): 153-66.
16- Kazemeini T, G.B., Moddarres M, Esmaeili M, The effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral therapy in reducing anger and aggressive driving. 2011; 3(2) 1-11.
17- Alijanzadeh M, M.-H.S., Kianersi, F, The Effectiveness of Group Dialectical Behavior Therapy (Based on Skills Training) on Aggression in Adolescents. J Clin Psychol. 2014; 3(23): 23-32.
18- Sharf, R.S., Theories of psychotherapy & counseling: Concepts and cases. 2015: Cengage Learning.
19- Beck, R. and E. Fernandez, Cognitive-behavioral therapy in the treatment of anger: A meta-analysis. Cognitive therapy and research. 1998; 22(1): 63-74.
20- Miles, S.R., et al., Emotion dysregulation mediates the relationship between traumatic exposure and aggression in healthy young women. Personality and Individual Differences. 2015; 76: 222-27.
21- MacManus, D., et al., Aggressive and violent behavior among military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan: prevalence and link with deployment and combat exposure. Epidemiologic reviews. 2015; 37(1): 196-212.
22- Brockhurst, J., et al., Stress inoculation modeled in mice. Translational psychiatry. 2015; 5(3): 1-5.
23- Kendall, P.C., Child and adolescent therapy: Cognitive-behavioral procedures. 2011. Guilford Press.
24- Serino, S., et al., Toward a validation of cyber-interventions for stress disorders based on stress inoculation training: a systematic review. Virtual Reality. 2014; 18(1): 73-87.
25- Chemtob, C.M., et al., Cognitive-behavioral treatment for severe anger in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 1997; 65(1): 184-89.
26- Ghamari, M., The effectiveness of stress inoculation training (SIT) in reducing anxiety. J Counseling Res. 2008; 7(26): 107-16.
27- Zahrakar, K., To evaluate the effectiveness of stress inoculation training (SIT) method on decreasing the symptoms of stress in patients with diabetes. J Counseling Res. 2013; 12(45): 131-47.
28- Zahrakar K, S.A., Delavar A., The effectiveness of stress inoculation training (SIT) in reducing psychological disorders. J Counseling Res. 2006; 5(17): 55-76.
29- Rajabi Z, N.M., Rezaei AM, The effectiveness of cognitive behavior group therapy in reducing aggression in children. Res clin psychol cunsl. 2012; 3(10): 55-71.
30- Roostaei A, A.S., Mohammadi AA, Saedi S, Compare the effectiveness of drug therapy on anger management and aggression prisoners. J Soc Psychol. 2011; 7(21): 19-31.
31- Yalom, I.D. and M. Leszcz, Theory and practice of group psychotherapy. 2005; Basic books.
32- N., M., A preliminary study on the psychometric indices Bass-Perry Aggression Questionnaire. J of Soc Scien and Human. 2006; 25(4): 135-51.
33- Barlow, D.H., et al., Principles and practice of stress management. 2007. Guilford Press.
34- Reilly, P.M., et al., Anger management for substance abuse and mental health clients: Participant workbook. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. A Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Manual. 2002.
35- Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. Hillsdale, NJ. 1988; 20-6.
36- Brestan, E.V. and S.M. Eyberg, Effective psychosocial treatments of conduct-disordered children and adolescents: 29 years, 82 studies, and 5,272 kids. Journal of clinical child psychology. 1998; 27(2): 180-9.
37- Maag, J.W. and J. Kotlash, Review of Stress Inoculation Taining with Children and Adolescents: Issues and Recommendations. Behavior Modification. 1994; 18(4): 443-69.
38- Meichenbaum, D., Roadmap to resilience: A guide for military, trauma victims and their families. 2012: Crown House Publishing Ltd.
39- Elwood, L.S., J.N. Soper, and B.O. Olatunji, Anger Management Techniques. The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology. 2015.
40- Moon, J.R. and R.M. Eisler, Anger control: An experimental comparison of three behavioral treatments. Behavior Therapy. 1983; 14(4): 493-505.
41- García-López, L.M. and D. Gutiérrez, The effects of a sport education season on empathy and assertiveness. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2015; 20(1): 1-16.
42- Praill, N., A. González-Prendes, and P. Kernsmith, An exploration of the relationships between attitudes towards anger expression and personal style of anger expression in women in the USA and Canada. Issues in mental health nursing. 2015; 36(6): 397-406.