بررسی تحلیلی رابطه ویژگی‌های زیستی، شناختی و روانی - اجتماعی والدین و رضامندی زوجیت با وزن هنگام تولد نوزادان

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان استثنایی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

2 گروه روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان استثنایی، دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

چکیده


مقدمه: وزن هنگام تولد یکی از شاخص‌های اصلی سلامتی نوزادان در زمان تولد است، که می‌تواند از یک سو نشانه چگونگی رشد درون رحمی جنین و از سوی دیگر نحوه مراقبت از مادر در دوران بارداری باشد. هدف از پژوهش حاضر، بررسی رابطه بین ویژگی‌های زیستی و رضامندی زوجیت با کم‌وزنی هنگام تولد نوزادان، در شهرستان چالوس بوده است.
روش: این پژوهش از نوع علی – مقایسه­ای و در سال 1395 بر روی 100 نوزاد تازه متولد شده و مادران آنها انجام گرفت. در انتخاب نمونه‌ها از روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، 50 مادر و نوزاد زیر وزن 2500 گرم و 50 مادر و نوزاد با وزن بالای 3800 گرم مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. اطلاعات با پرسشنامه ویژگی‌های زیستی، شناختی، روانی - اجتماعی والدین افروز و پرسشنامه رضامندی زوجیت افروز جمع‌آوری شدو سپس داده‌ها با آماره‌های توصیفی، آزمون مجذور کای و تحلیل رگرسیون لوجستیک، نرم‌افزار SPSS نسخه 22 تحلیل گردیدند.
یافته­ ها: بر اساس یافته‌ها، فراوانی تولد نوزادان کم‌وزن (با سن 37 هفته و بالاتر) در شهرستان چالوس 3/7% بوده است. 3/33% مادران باردار سن زیر 20 سال و 11% آن‌ها سن بالای 35 سال داشتند. 23/8% از والدین نوزادان کم‌وزن نسبت خویشاوندی نزدیک داشتند. تحلیل‌ها نشان داد که بین ویژگی زیستی (سن مادر) و رضامندی زوجیت با کم‌وزنی هنگام تولد ارتباط معناداری وجود داشت. اما بین ویژگی شناختی و روانی اجتماعی مادران و کم ­وزنی هنگام تولد نوزادان رابطه‌ی معناداری یافت نشد.
نتیجه­ گیری: نتایج این مطالعه نشان داد که برخی از ویژگی‌های زیستی و روانی مادران بر کم‌وزنی هنگام تولد نوزادان، تأثیر قابل توجهی داشتند و می‌توانند در برنامه‌های پیشگیری از تولد نوزادان کم‌وزن مورد توجه بیشتری قرار گیرند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Analytical Study on Relationships of Biological, Cognitive and Psychosocial Characteristics and Marital Satisfaction with Low Birth Weight in Newborn Babies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Gholam Ali Afrooz 1
  • jaleh khajavi 1
  • samaneh maleki 2
  • fatemeh farid 1
1 department of psychology and education of exceptional children, faculty of psychology and education, tehran university, tehran, iran
2 department of psychology and education of exceptional children, faculty of psychology and education, Tehran university, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: From a public health standpoint, the average weight of newborns is one of the main indicators of the quality of health care services received, reproductive health, safe motherhood, nutrition and intrauterine growth during pregnancy. The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between the biological characteristics and the marital satisfaction of mothers who give birth to newborns with low birth weight (LBW) in the city of Chalus.
Method: This is a causal–comparative study, conducted in 2016 in which the mothers of 50 newborns with a birth weight of less than 2500 g and those of 50 newborns with an ideal / satisfactory weight of more than 3800 g were surveyed. The information was gathered with Afrooz Questionnaires for Biological, Cognitive, Psychological and Social traits of Mothers and Marital Satisfaction of Couples. The data collected from the questionnaires was analyzed with descriptive statistics and logistical regression using SPSS version 22.
Results: The results of this study showed that the frequency of newborns with LBW in Chalus was%3/7. The frequency of pregnant mothers with an age of less than 20 was%3/33 while those over 35 was%11, and%23/8 with consanguineous marriages. The analysis showed that of the maternal characteristics studied, Mather’s age and marital satisfaction had a statistically significant relationship with LBW in newborns.
Conclusion: This study demonstrated that certain biological and psychological maternal traits have a considerable impact on LBW in newborns, and can be further considered in programs aimed towards the prevention of LBW.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Low Birth Weight
  • Biological traits
  • marital satisfaction
1. Campos-Serna J, Ronda-Pérez E, Artazcoz L, Moen BE, Benavides FG. Gender inequalities in occupational health related to the unequal distribution of working and employment conditions: a systematic review. International journal for equity in health. 2013 Dec; 12(1): 57.
2. Mathews, T. J., MacDorman, M. F., & Thoma, M. E. Infant mortality statistics from the 2013 period linked birth/infant death data set.Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015; 64(1): 1-26.
3. Linsell L, Malouf R, Johnson S, Morris J, Kurinczuk JJ, Marlow N. Prognostic factors for behavioral problems and psychiatric disorders in children born very preterm or very low birth weight: a systematic review. Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics: JDBP. 2016 Jan; 37(1): 88-102.
4. Talebian MH, Afrooz GA, Homan HA, Aaghei A. The effects of biological and psychological traits of mothers on low birth weight in Isfahan province. J Health Syst Res 2013; 9(10): 1138-48.
 
5. Malin GL, Morris RK, Riley R, Teune MJ, Khan KS. When is birthweight at term abnormally low? A systematic review and meta‐analysis of the association and predictive ability of current birthweight standards for neonatal outcomes. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2014 Apr 1; 121(5): 515-26.
6. Levine TA, Grunau RE, McAuliffe FM, Pinnamaneni R, Foran A, Alderdice FA. Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2014 Dec 1: 126-135.
 7. George K, Prasad J, Singh D, Minz S, Albert DS, Muliyil J, Joseph KS, Jayaraman J, Kramer MS. Perinatal outcomes in a South Asian setting with high rates of low birth weight. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2009 Dec; 9(1): 5.
8. Love C, David RJ, Rankin KM, Collins Jr JW. Exploring weathering: effects of lifelong economic environment and maternal age on low birth weight, small for gestational age, and preterm birth in African-American and white women. American journal of epidemiology. 2010 Jun 24; 172(2): 127-34.
9. Hack M, Taylor HG, Drotar D, Schluchter M, Cartar L, Andreias L, Wilson-Costello D, Klein N. Chronic conditions, functional limitations, and special health care needs of school-aged children born with extremely low-birth-weight in the 1990s. Jama. 2005 Jul 20; 294(3): 318-25.
10. Carmody JB, Charlton JR. Short-term gestation, long-term risk: prematurity and chronic kidney disease. Pediatrics. 2013 Jun 1; 131(6): 1168-79.
11. Smith KR, Hanson HA. Early influences on health and mortality in adulthood. In J. D. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 6(2): 752-8.
12. Roberts G, Cheong J, Opie G, Carse E, Davis N, Duff J, Lee KJ, Doyle L, Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Growth of extremely preterm survivors from birth to 18 years of age compared with term controls. Pediatrics. 2013 Feb 1; 131(2): 439-45.
13. Petrou S, Eddama O, Mangham L. A structured review of the recent literature on the economic consequences of preterm birth. Archives of Disease in Childhood-Fetal and Neonatal Edition. 2011 May 1; 96(3): F225-32.
14. Gibbs CM, Wendt A, Peters S, Hogue CJ. The impact of early age at first childbirth on maternal and infant health. Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology. 2012 Jul 1; 26(s1): 259-84.
15. Khan MW, Arbab M, Murad M, Khan MB, Abdullah S. Study of factors affecting and causing low birth weight. Journal of Scientific Research. 2014 Apr 25; 6(2): 387-94.
16. Unicef. Child Info: Monitoring the Situation of Children and Women. 2014. Statistics by area/water and sanitation. 2016.
17. Pereira-Freire JA, Lemos JO, de Sousa AF, Meneses CC, Rondó PH. Association between weight at birth and body composition in childhood: A Brazilian cohort study. Early human development. 2015 Aug 1; 91(8): 445-9.
18. Holbrook BD. The effects of nicotine on human fetal development. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews. 2016 Jun 1; 108(2): 181-92.
19. Chen CH, Lin HC. Prenatal care and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with depression: a nationwide population-based study. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2011 May; 56(5): 273-80.
20. Lelic M, Bogdanovic G, Ramic S, Brkicevic E. Influence of maternal anemia during pregnancy on placenta and newborns. Medical Archives. 2014 Jun; 68(3): 184-7.
21. Takito MY, Benício MH. Physical activity during pregnancy and fetal outcomes: a case-control study. Revista de saude publica. 2010 Feb; 44(1): 90-101.
22. Werner E, Miller M, Osborne LM, Kuzava S, Monk C. Preventing postpartum depression: review and recommendations. Archives of women's mental health. 2015 Feb 1; 18(1): 41-60.
23. Jeong HG, Lim JS, Lee MS, Kim SH, Jung IK, Joe SH. The association of psychosocial factors and obstetric history with depression in pregnant women: focus on the role of emotional support. General hospital psychiatry. 2013 Jul 1; 35(4): 354-8.
24. haroon rashidi H, arjmandniya AA, afrooz GA, beshlideh Q. Comparison of Psychological Distress of Low Birth Weight–Newborns, Mothers with those of normal weight-newborns’ counterparts. Scientific journal of Ilam University of medical sciences. 2014 Feb 1; 21(7): 54-9.
25. Balaji K, Sankar S, Nandagopal B. Low birth weight of newborns: Magnitude of the problem seen in a 100 bed hospital of a rural area in Vellore district, Tamil Nadu (India). Indian journal of community medicine: official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine. 2010 Apr; 35(2): 362-7.