پیش‌بینی سازگاری زناشویی زوج‌های جوان بر مبنای ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، تمایزیافتگی خود و سرسختی

روشن نژاد, نجمه; بیان فر, فاطمه; طالع پسند, سیاوش

doi:10.22075/jcp.2019.17207.1632

پیش‌بینی سازگاری زناشویی زوج‌های جوان بر مبنای ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، تمایزیافتگی خود و سرسختی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

¹ کارشناس ارشد مشاوره خانواده دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

² استادیار، گروه روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

³ دانشیار، گروه روانشناسی تربیتی دانشگاه سمنان، سمنان، ایران

10.22075/jcp.2019.17207.1632

چکیده

مقدمه: هدف این پژوهش پیش‌بینی سازگاری زوج های جوان از طریق ویژگی‌های شخصیتی، تمایزیافتگی خود و سرسختی روانشناختی در شهر اهواز بود.
روش: پژوهش‌ حاضر توصیفی – همبستگی بود. جامعۀ پژوهش شامل کلیۀ زوج‌های جوان 20 تا 40 ساله شهر اهواز در سال 1397 بودند که به مراکز بهداشتی و درمانی مراجعه کرده بودند و بر طبق آمار شبکه بهداشت شهر اهواز 9374 نفر بودند. نمونۀ مورد مطالعه 368 نفر (184 زوج) بود که به روش نمونه‌گیری خوشه‌ای دومرحله‌ای انتخاب شدند و پرسشنامه‌های شخصیتی نئو مک کرا و کاستا، سازگاری زناشویی گراهام بی اسیانیر، تمایزیافتگی خود دریک و سرسختی کوباسا را تکمیل نمودند. داده‌ها با استفاده از آزمون همبستگی پیرسون و آزمون تحلیل رگرسیون چندگانه تحلیل شد.
یافته‌ها: از ویژگی های شخصیتی نئو: برون گرایی 75/0، وظیفه شناسی 49/0، توافق جویی48/0 ، گشودگی33/0 و روان رنجورخویی 54/0- ؛ از ابعاد تمایزیافتگی خود: جایگاه من 056/0، واکنش پذیری عاطفی 4/0، و گریز عاطفی19/0- ؛ و از ابعاد سرسختی: کنترل41/0، چالش طلبی42/0 و تعهد 41/0 با سازگاری زناشویی ارتباط داشتند. بررسی رگرسیون بطور معنادار برای برون گرایی، روان رنجورخویی و گشودگی ضرایب بتای 63/0، 112/0- و 07/0 ؛ برای جایگاه من، واکنش پذیری عاطفی، هم آمیختگی و گریز عاطفی ضرایب بتای 59/0 ، 27/0 ، 26/0 و 13/0- ؛ و برای کنترل، چالش طلبی و تعهد نیز ضرایب بتای 26/0 ، 22/0 و 18/0 را نشان داد.
نتیجه‌گیری: میتوان گفت زوجهایی که برونگرایی، وظیفهشناسی، توافقجویی و گشودگی بالاتر و روان رنجورخویی پایینتری دارند و از تمایزیافتگی خود و سرسختی روانشناختی بالاتری برخوردارند در زندگی زناشویی خود سازگارتر هستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

تخصصی

عنوان مقاله [English]

Predicting Marital Adjustment among Young Couples based on Personality Traits, Differentiation of Self and Psychological Hardiness

نویسندگان [English]

N Roshannejhad, ¹
*F Bayanfar, ²
s talepasand ³

¹ Semnan universitypayamnoor

² faculty member of university ,payam-noor university ,ُُSemnan,]ran

³ Associate Professor of Psychology, Semnan University, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction: The aim of this study was to predict marital adjustment among young couples in Ahvaz based on personality traits, differentiation of self and psychological hardiness.
Method: Design of this study was descriptive-correlational. Statistical population included all young couples in the age range of 20 to 40 years old in Ahvaz city in 2019. Participants were 368 male and female that were selected by a multistage cluster sampling method among all young couples. Tools were Neo Five Factor Inventory, Differentiation of self-Inventory, Kobasa Hardiness Questionnaire and Graham–Bisspicrrier Marital Adjustment Questionnaire. Data were analyzed using Pearson’s Correlation and Multiple Regression Analysis.
Results: From Neo personality traits: E (0/75), C (0/49), A(0/48), O(0/33) and N(-0/54); from differentiation of self dimensions: I position (0/56), emotional reactivity (0/40), emotional fusion (-0/19) and from hardiness: commitment (0/41), challenge (0/42) and control (0/42) were related with marital adjustment. Regression analysis showed significantly Beta coefficients for E(0/63), N(-0/11), O(0/07), for I position (0/59), emotional reactivity0/27, emotional fusion (0/26), emotional cutoff (-0/13), and for control (0/26), challenge(0/22) and commitment (0/18).
Conclusion: It could be concluded that couples who are higher in E, C, A, O and lower in N, and are more differentiated of self and psychological hardiness are more compatible in their marital life.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Maritl Adjastment
Personality Trait
Differentiation of Self
Hardiness

مراجع

1- Kreitler S. Personality traits as patterns of meaning assignment tendencies. Journal of personality. 2018; 86(1): 55-68.

2- Watson D, Hubbard B, Wiese D. General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self‐and partner‐ratings. Journal of personality. 2000; 68(3): 413-49.

3- Amani A. Eisanejad O. Azizi A. study of the structural relations of Early Maladaptive schemas, personality Factors and Marital Adjustment. Journal Management system. 2015; 10(37): 45-70. [in Persian].

4- Dargis M, Newman J, Koenigs M, Dargis M, Newman J, Koenigs M. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Advance online publication. 2015; 10(2): 123-31.

5- Magee C, Biesanz JC. Toward understanding the relationship between personality and well‐being states and traits. Journal of personality. 2019; 87(2): 276-94.

6- Xie J, Zhou ZE, Gong Y. Relationship between proactive personality and marital satisfaction: A spillover-crossover perspective. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018; 128: 75-80.

7- Klever P. Goal direction and effectiveness, emotional maturity, and nuclear family functioning. Journal of marital and family therapy. 2009; 35(3): 308-24.

8- Skowron EA, Dendy AK. Differentiation of self and attachment in adulthood: Relational correlates of effortful control. Contemporary family therapy. 2004; 26(3): 337-57.

9- YooYa Y. The relationship among the family functioning self-differentiation and junior high school student's irrational believes. Journal of Social psychology. 2007; 73: 223-34.

10- Peleg O, Messerschmidt‐Grandi C. Differentiation of self and trait anxiety: A cross‐cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychology. 2018.

11- Yoosefi N. Azizi A. Explaning a model to predict marital conflict based on differentiation and personality types. Culture counseling. 2018;9:57-78. [in Persian].

12- Lampis J, Cataudella S. Adult Attachment and Differentiation of Self-Constructs: A Possible Dialogue? Contemporary Family Therapy. 2019; 1-9.

13- Mahmoudimehr M. Navabinejab GH. The effect of couple therapy Bowen's approach on differentiation couples. Journal of consoling Research. 2010; 1(39): 7-18. [in Persian].

14- Kowalski CM, Schermer JA. Hardiness, perseverative cognition, anxiety, and health-related outcomes: A case for and against psychological hardiness. Psychological reports. 2018:0033294118800444.

15- Eroz, S. Su., Onat, E. psychological hardiness: a survey in hospitality management. Research Journal of Business and Management. 2018; 5(1): 81-9.

16- Ahmadi F. Naeinian M R. Hydarinasub L. To study simple and Multiple correlation among Extroversion and psychological Hardiness with Happiness in students Regarding to sexuality. Journal of clinical psychology. 2015; 7(1): 63-73.

17- Sivrikaya MH. The Role of Psychological Hardiness on Performance of Scissors Kick. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 2018; 6(n12a): 70-4.

18- Miri M. Shirazi M. comparison of personality trait, and Altitude to suicide in two Groups of individuals with suicide Attempts by self – Immolation and Drug use. Journal of Clinical psychology. 2009; 1(33): 11-20.

19- Skowron EA, Friedlander ML. The Differentiation of Self Inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of counseling psychology. 1998; 45(3): 235.

20- Skowron EA, Schmitt TA. Assessing interpersonal fusion: Reliability and validity of a new DSI fusion with others subscale. Journal of marital and family therapy. 2003; 29(2): 209-22.

21- Naemi AM. The resiliency, hardiness, life satisfaction and body image in high school female students of sabzevar. Women in Development and politics. 2017; 14(4): 535-52. [in Persian].

22- Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, Larson JH. A revision of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and family Therapy. 1995; 21(3): 289-308.

23- Spanier GB. Assessing the strengths of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale. 1988.

24- Bradbury TN, Fincham FD, Beach SR. Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of marriage and family. 2000; 62(4): 964-80.

25- Arefi M. Rahimi A. Sheikh Esmaili M. predicting Marital Adjustment among young teaching couples on the Basis of Differentiation from the family of origin and parents marital satisfaction. quarterlyJournal of Family and Research. 2016; 13(2): 87-106. [in Persian].

26- Shaud S, Asad S. Marital adjustment, convergent communication patterns, and psychological distress in women with early and late marriage. Current Psychology. 2018; 1-8.

27- Jazayeri S H. Delavar A. Dortaj F. Developing a model of happiness based personality traits, emotional intelligence, attachment style, Voluntary activities and demographic characteristics. Culture Counseling. 2018; 9(35): 27-56. [in Persian].

28- Lee J-Y, Kim J-S, Kim S-S, Jeong J-K, Yoon S-J, Kim S-J, et al. Relationship between Health Behaviors and Marital Adjustment and Marital Intimacy in Multicultural Family Female Immigrants. Korean journal of family medicine. 2019; 40(1): 31.