ویژگی‌های روانسنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه دوسوگرایی به خود مرتبط با وسواس فکری ـ عملی

دادفرنیا, شکوفه; موسویان, الهام

doi:10.22075/jcp.2020.18238.1702

ویژگی‌های روانسنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه دوسوگرایی به خود مرتبط با وسواس فکری ـ عملی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشجوی دکتری روانشناسی بالینی، دانشکده علوم‌تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

10.22075/jcp.2020.18238.1702

چکیده

مقدمه: پرسشنامه دوسوگرایی به خود (SAM) یک ابزار نسبتا جدید است که برای سنجش سازه دوسوگرایی در بافت علائم وسواس فکری-عملی طراحی شده ‌است. هدف پژوهش حاضر بررسی ویژگی های روانسنجی نسخه فارسی این پرسشنامه می باشد.
روش: پژوهش حاضر از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی می باشد. 280 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه‌های شیراز با روش نمونه‌گیری داوطلبانه انتخاب و نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه دوسوگرایی به خود، پرسشنامه نشخوار- تأمل و پرسشنامه اعتماد به نفس روزنبرگ را تکمیل کردند. ساختار عاملی پرسشنامه با روش تحلیل عامل اکتشافی مورد بررسی قرارگرفت. برای بررسی پایایی پرسشنامه، ضرایب اسپیرمن براون و آلفای کرونباح محاسبه ‌شد و جهت بررسی روایی همزمان، همبستگی این پرسشنامه با پرسشنامه عزت‌نفس و نشخوار-تأمل محاسبه شد.
یافته‌ها: تحلیل عامل اکتشافی نشانگر استخراج 4 مؤلفه افکار متعارض درباره خود، دیدگاه دوقطبی نسبت به خود، نگرانی راجع به قضاوت دیگران و اشتغال ذهنی در مورد ارزش خود بود که در مجموع 8/63 واریانس را تبیین می کرد. ضریب پایایی پرسشنامه نیز به روش آلفای کرونباخ برای کل پرسشنامه 91/۰ بود.
نتیجه گیری: پرسشنامه دوسوگرایی به خود از ویژگی های روان‌سنجی مطلوبی در جامعه دانشجویی برخوردار است هرچند برای کاربرد آن در سایر جمعیت‌ها، مطالعات بیشتری در این زمینه مورد نیاز است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Psychometric Properties of Persian Version of Self-Ambivalence Measure about Obsessive Compulsive Disorder

نویسندگان [English]

Shekoofeh Dadfarnia
Elham Moosavian

PhD Student in Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Abstract
Introduction: The Self-Ambivalence Measure (SAM) is a relatively new instrument designed to measure self-ambivalence in the context of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. The aim of present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the SAM-Persian version.
Method: Applying a descriptive-correlational research method a sample with 280 participants were selected from undergraduate students of Shiraz universities on a voluntary basis. The participants completed the Persian version of Self-Ambivalence Measure, Rumination- Reflection Questionnaire (RRQ) and The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Questionnaire (RSE). The factor structure of SAM was investigated using exploratory factor analysis. The Cronbach’s alpha and Spearman-Brown coefficient were computed to obtain the reliability measures. Convergent validity of SAM was examined by the patterns of correlations between the SAM with RRQ and RSE.
Results: Exploratory factor analysis resulted in the extraction of four components: 1- conflicting thoughts of self, 2- dichotomous view of self 3- fear of others’ judgment, and 4- preoccupation with self-worth. These components totally explained 63.8% of the variance. The reliability of the questionnaire was obtained 0.91 using Cronbach's alpha.
Conclusion: Results indicated desirable psychometric characteristics of the SAM in student populations. However, more research is required to ensure the applicability of the instrument in other populations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
Self-Ambivalence
Validity
Factor Analysis

مراجع

منابع

1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. BMC Med. 2013; 17: 133-7.

2. Mundo E, Zanoni S, Altamura AC. Genetic issues in obsessive-compulsive disorder and related disorders. Psychiatric Annals. 2001; 7(36).

3. Narayan VM, Narr KL, Phillips OR, Thompson PM, Toga AW, Szeszko PR. Greater regional cortical gray matter thickness in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuroreport. 2008; 19(15): 1551.

4. Hudson JL, Rapee RM. Parent–child interactions and anxiety disorders: An observational study. Behaviour research and therapy. 2001; 39(12): 1411-27.

5. Rachman S. A cognitive theory of obsessions. Behavior and Cognitive Therapy Today: Elsevier; 1998. p. 209-22.

6. Aardema F, Moulding R, Melli G, Radomsky AS, Doron G, Audet JS, et al. The role of feared possible selves in obsessive–compulsive and related disorders: A comparative analysis of a core cognitive self‐construct in clinical samples. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. 2018; 25(1): e19-e29.

7. Ahern C, Kyrios M. Self processes in obsessive–compulsive. The Self in Understanding and Treating Psychological Disorders. 2016; 12: 112-22.

8. Ferrier S, Brewin CR. Feared identity and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2005; 43(10): 1363-74.

9. Kyrios M, Nelson B, Ahern C, Fuchs T, Parnas J. The self in psychopathology. Psychopathology. 2015; 48(5): 275.

10. Rowa K, Purdon C, Summerfeldt LJ, Antony MM. Why are some obsessions more upsetting than others? Behaviour Research and Therapy. 2005; 43(11): 1453-1565.

11. Rachman S. Primary obsessional slowness. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Theory, research and treatment. 2003; 10: 181-94.

12. Aardema F, Moulding R, Radomsky AS, Doron G, Allamby J, Souki E. Fear of self and obsessionality: Development and validation of the Fear of Self Questionnaire. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders. 2013; 2(3): 306-15.

13. Melli G, Aardema F, Moulding R. Fear of self and unacceptable thoughts in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. 2016; 23(3): 226-35.

14. Belloch A, Morillo C, Lucero M, Cabedo E, Carrió C. Intrusive thoughts in non‐clinical subjects: The role of frequency and unpleasantness on appraisal ratings and control strategies. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal of Theory & Practice. 2004; 11(2): 100-10.

15. Taylor S, Abramowitz JS, McKay D, Calamari JE, Sookman D, Kyrios M, et al. Do dysfunctional beliefs play a role in all types of obsessive–compulsive disorder? Journal of Anxiety Disorders. 2006; 20(1): 85-97.

16. Guidano VF, Liotti G. Cognitive processes and emotional disorders: A structural approach to psychotherapy: Guilford Press; 1983.

17. Tisher R, Allen JS, Crouch W. The S elf‐A mbivalence M easure: A psychometric investigation. Australian Journal of Psychology. 2014; 66(3): 197-206.

18. Trapnell PD, Campbell JD. Private self-consciousness and the five-factor model of personality: distinguishing rumination from reflection. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999; 76(2): 284.

19. Gould JR, Prentice NM, Aisnlie RC. The Splitting Index: Construction of a scale measuring the defense mechanism of splitting. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1996; 66(2): 414-30.

20. Campbell JD, Trapnell PD, Heine SJ, Katz IM, Lavallee LF, Lehman DR. Self-concept clarity: Measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1996; 70(1): 141

21. Bhar SS. Self-ambivalence in obsessive-compulsive disorder [PhD thesis].Melbourne: University of Melbourne; 2005. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org

22. Campbell JD, Lavallee LF. Who am I? The role of self-concept confusion in understanding the behavior of people with low self-esteem. In: Campbell JD, editor. Self-esteem: Springer;1993. p. 3-20.

Porporino FJ, Robinson D. Programming in cognitive skills. In: Hollin CR, editor. Handbook of offender assessment and treatment. Chichester: Wiley; 2001. p. 179-93.

23. Riketta M, Ziegler R. Self-ambivalence and self-esteem. Current Psychology. 2006; 25(3): 192-211.

24. Gramzow RH, Sedikides C, Panter A, Insko CA. Aspects of self-regulation and self-structure as predictors of perceived emotional distress. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000; 26(2): 188-205.

25. ÜNCÜER FÖ. Percieved parenting styles, self-ambivalence, cognitive and emotional regulation in relation to obsessive-compulsive symptomatology: Middle East Technical University; 2015.

26. Bhar SS, Kyrios M. An investigation of self-ambivalence in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour research and therapy. 2007; 45(8): 1845-57.

27. Frost RO, Kyrios M, McCarthy KD, Matthews Y. Self-ambivalence and attachment to possessions. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2007; 21(3): 234-42.

28. Bhar SS, Kyrios M, Hordern C. Self-Ambivalence in the Cognitive-Behavioural Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. Psychopathology. 2015; 48(5): 349-56.

29. Phillips B, Moulding R, Kyrios M, Nedeljkovic M, Mancuso S. The relationship between body dysmorphic disorder symptoms and self‐construals. Clinical Psychologist. 2011; 15(1): 10-6

30. Ahern C, Kyrios M, Moulding R. Self-based concepts and obsessive-compulsive phenomena. Psychopathology. 2015; 48(5): 287-92.

31. Perera-Delcourt R, Nash RA, Thorpe SJ. Priming moral self-ambivalence heightens deliberative behaviour in self-ambivalent individuals. Behavioural and cognitive psychotherapy. 2014; 42(6): 682-92.

32. Ahern C, Kyrios M, Meyer D. Exposure to unwanted intrusions, neutralizing and their effects on self-worth and obsessive-compulsive phenomena. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry. 2015; 49: 216-22.

33. Frost RO, Kyrios M, McCarthy KD, Matthews Y. Self-ambivalence and attachment to possessions. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy. 2007; 21(3): 232.

34. Labuschagne I, Castle DJ, Rossell SL. What the cognitive deficits in body dysmorphic disorder tell us about the underlying neurobiology: an investigation of three cases. International Journal of Cognitive Therapy. 2011; 4(1): 21-33.

35. Labuschagne I, Castle DJ, Dunai J, Kyrios M, Rossell SL. An examination of delusional thinking and cognitive styles in body dysmorphic disorder. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 2010; 44(8): 706-12.

36. Ghorbani N, Watson P, Hargis MB. Integrative Self-Knowledge Scale: Correlations and incremental validity of a cross-cultural measure developed in Iran and the United States. The Journal of Psychology. 2008; 142(4): 395-412.

37. Pullmann H, Allik J. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: its dimensionality, stability and personality correlates in Estonian. Personality and Individual differences. 2000; 28(4): 701-15

38. Mohammadi N. The preliminary study of validity and reliability of Rosenberg’s self-esteem scale. Journal of Iranian Psychologists. 2005; 1(4): 55-62.

39. Gh R, Bohlul N. Evaluation reliability and validity Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale among Shahid Chamran freshman student. Research educative and psychology. 2007; 2: 33-48.

40. Baumgardner AH. To know oneself is to like oneself: Self-certainty and self-affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990; 58(6): 1062.