ذهنی سازی والدینی و تنظیم هیجان: اعتباریابی و پایایی سنجی نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه کنش وری بازتابی والدین

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

2 کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی، دانشگاه آزاد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران

چکیده

چکیده
مقدمه: پژوهش حاضر با هدف سنجش پایایی و اعتبار نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه کنش وری بازتابی والدین (PRFQ) انجام گرفت.
روش:به این منظور پرسشنامه پس از آماده سازی به روش ترجمه و ترجمه مجدد، به همراه پرسشنامه سلامت عمومی (GHQ) و پرسشنامه دشواری در تنظیم هیجان (DERS)، توسط 308 والد (233 زن و 75 مرد) دارای فرزند زیر سه سال، در شهر تهران تکمیل شد. برای استخراج نتایج، از ضریب آلفای کرونباخ، تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی و تاییدی و همبستگی استفاده شد.
یافته‌ها: دامنه آلفای کرونباخ برای سه زیر مقیاس پرسشنامه شامل، "پیش ذهنی سازی"، "اطمینان از حالت ذهنی" و "علاقه و کنجکاوی به حالات ذهنی" به ترتیب 90/0، 89/0 و 75/0 بود. پایایی باز‌آزمایی با دامنه همبستگی92/0 تا 97/0، نیز نشان دهنده پایایی مطلوب این مقیاس بود. در بررسی اعتبار سازه سه زیر‌مقیاس به‌دست آمد که معادل سه زیر مقیاس در نسخه اصلی بودند. همه زیرمقیاس های دشواری در تنظیم هیجان، با زیرمقیاس " علاقه و کنجکاوی به حالات ذهنی" همبستگی منفی معنادار داشتند و بیشتر زیرمقیاس های دشواری در تنظیم هیجان، با دو زیر مقیاس دیگر کنش وری بازتابی والدین، همبستگی مثبت معنی دار داشتند که بیانگر اعتبار همگرا و واگرای مطلوب مقیاس است.
نتیجه گیری:در نهایت می‌توان گفت نسخه فارسی پرسشنامه کنشوری بازتابی والدین دارای پایایی و اعتبار مطلوب است و می تواند در مطالعات در نمونه ایرانی مورد استفاده قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Parental Mentalizing and Emotion Regulation: Validity and Reliability of the Persian version of The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire

نویسندگان [English]

  • Maryam Esmaeilinasab 1
  • shirin hajihashemi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran
2 Master of Psychology, Azad University of South Tehran, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract
Introduction: The present study aimed at determining the reliability and validity of the Persian translation of Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ; Luyten, Mayes, Nijssens, & Fonagy, 2017).
Method: Therefore, the Persian version of the scale prepared by translation and back translation the original questionnaire, and after a pilot study, was completed by 308 parents (233 female and 75 male) who had children under three-years-old in Tehran, accompanied with General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28; Goldberg, 1972) and Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS; Gratz and Roemer, 2004).
Results: Cronbach's alpha for three subscales, “pre-mentalizing mode”, “certainty about mental states” and “interest & curiosity in mental states” were 0/90, 0/89 and 0/79 prospectively. Three subscales achieved in construct validity that was equal to the original version. All subscales of DERS had significantly negative correlation with “interest & curiosity in mental states” and most of subscales had significantly positive correlation with “pre-mentalizing mode”, “certainty about mental states” which confirms the convergent and divergent validity of PRFQ.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that the Persian version of this scale has good validity and reliability and can efficiently use in studies with Iranian sample.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Parental Mentalizing
  • Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (PRFQ)
  • Reliability
  • Validity

مراجع

منابع
1. Luyten P, Campbell, C., Allison, E., & Fonagy, P. The mentalizing approach to psychopathology: State of the art and future directions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology. 2020;16:28.
2. Allen JG, Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A.W. Mentalizing in clinical practice. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2008.
3. Luyten P, Fonagy P., Lowyck, B., Vermote, R. Handbook of mentalizing in mental health practice. The assessment of mentalization In ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2012.
4. Luyten P, Mayes, LC., Nijssens, L., & Fonagy, P. Parental Reflective Functioning: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. 2017;70(1):25.
5. Lemma A, Target, M. & Fonagy, P. The development of a brief psychodynamic intervention (Dynamic Interpersonal Therapy) and its application to depression: A pilot study. Psychiatry Interpersonal and Biological Processes 2011;74(1):7.
6. Fonagy P, Luyten, P., & Strathearn, L. Borderline personality disorder, mentalization, and the neurobiology of attachment. Infant mental health journal. 2011;32(1):22.
7. Slade A, Grienenberger, J., Bernbach, E., Levy, D., & Locker, A. Maternal reflective functioning, attachment, and the transmission gap: a preliminary study. Attachment & humandevelopment. 2005;7(3):15.
8. Rutherford HJ, Goldberg, B., Luyten, P., Bridgett, D. J., & Mayes, L. C. Parental reflective functioning is associated with tolerance of infant distress but not general distress: evidence for a specific relationship using a simulated baby paradigm. Infant Behavior and Development. 2013;36(4):6.
9. Fonagy P, Gergely, G. & Target, M.. The parent–infant dyad and the construction of the subjective self. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2007;48(4-3):40.
10. Rostad WL, & Whitaker, D. J.. The association between reflective functioning and parent–child relationship quality. Journal of Child and Family Studies. 2016;25:13.
11. Luyten P, Mayes, L. C., Nijssens, L., & Fonagy, P. The Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire: Development and preliminary validation. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5).
12. Rutherford HJ, Booth, C. R., Luyten, P., Bridgett, D. J., & Mayes, L. C. Investigating the association between parental reflective functioning and distress tolerance in motherhood.Infant Behavior and Development. 2015;40:9.
13. Gordo L, Iriarte Elejalde, L., & Martinez-Pampliega, A. Spanish Version of the Parental Reflective Functioning Questionnaire (CFRP-18(REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE DIAGNOSTICO Y EVALUACION-E AVALIACAO PSICOLOGICA. 2020;2(55):12.
14. Cooke D, Priddis, L., Luyten, P., Kendall, G., & Cavanagh, R. Paternal and maternal reflective functioning in the western australian peel chaid health study. Infant mental health journal. 2017;38(5):13.
15. Lee Y, Meins, E., Larkin,F. Translation and preliminary validation of a Korean version of the parental reflective functioning questionnaire. Infant Mental Health Journal. 2020:12.
16. Mora RCR, Alpi, S. V., & Grisalez, L. V. C. Propiedades psicométricas del cuestionario Función Reflexiva Parental (PRFQ) en la población monteriana. Utopía y praxis latinoamericana: revista internacional de filosofía iberoamericana y teoría social. 2020;3:8.
17. De Roo M, Wong, G., Rempel, G. R., & Fraser, S. N. Advancing Optimal Development in Children: Examining the Construct Validity of a Parent Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. JMIR pediatrics and parenting. 2019;2(1).
18. DeVellis RF. Scale development: Theory and applications. 3 ed: Sage publications; 2016.
19. Esmaeilinasab M AKA, AzarmiH, Samar Rakhi A. The Predicting Role of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation and Distress Tolerance in Students’ Addiction Potential. Quarterly Journal of Research on Addiction. 2014;8(29):14.
20. Aminiyan M AP, Pasha GH. Relationship between Emotion Regulation, Mental Stresses and Body Image with Eating Disorders of Women. Thought and Behavior in Clinical Psychology. 2009;4(13):13.
21. Ebrahimi A MH, Moosavi G, Bornamanesh A, Yaghobi M.. Psychometric Properties and Factor Structure of General Health Questionnaire 28(GHQ-28) in Iranian Psychiatric Patients. Journal of Research in Behavioural Science. 2008;9(5):7.
22. Ensink K, & Mayes, L. C.. The development of mentalization in children from a theory of mind perspective. Psychoanalytic Inquiry. 2010;30(4):36.
23. Cooper A, & Redfern, S. Reflective parenting: A guide to understanding what’s going on inyour child’s mind. London: UK: Routledge; 2016.
24. Fonagy P, & Luyten, P.. A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Development and Psychopathology. 2009;21(4):26.
25. Fonagy P, Luyten, P. & Allison, E.. Epistemic petrification and the restoration of epistemic trust: A new conceptualization of borderline personality disorder and its psychosocial treatment. Journal of Personality Disorders. 2015;29(5):34.
26. Kosari F EM. The Relation Between Mothers’ Cognitive Emotion Regulation Style and Their Reactions to Children’s Negative Emotions. Journal of Family Research. 2018;14(2):14.
27. Kosari F EM. Normalization of Parents’ Response to Children’ s Positive Emotions Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology & Personality. 2019;2(16):12.
28. Sadeghzadeh M BF, Khormaei F. Mother’s Patience Components and Child Abuse Potential: The Mediation Role of Emotional Dysregulation. Journal of Developmental Psychology Iranian Psychologists. 2020;16(32):9.
29. Shokoufefard SH MMA, Heidari M, Seyed Mousavi P.. Development of Attachment Representations and Maternal Sensitivity. Journal of Developmental Psychology Iranian Psychologists. 2018;14(56):16.
Camoirano A. Mentalizing Makes Parenting Work: A Review about Parental Reflective Functioning and Clinical Interventions to Improve It. Front Psychol. 2017;8(14).

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 26 آبان 1399
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 20 اردیبهشت 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 29 اردیبهشت 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار